When mentoring our
pre-service and in-service teachers we need to describe and model both
research-based and clinically tested best practices, and demonstrate how these
best practices can be applied in the real (i.e. physical) and virtual (i.e.
online) classroom for both teaching and teacher training. The combination of
face to face instruction in a physical setting and online learning is called
blended learning. In this section of the blog we will describe how the internet
can serve as a supplemental resource for instruction and the mentoring of pre-service
and in-service Jewish educators. In this post we will begin our discussion of how Think-Trix
can be used to promote skillful, creative and critical thinking in the Judaic
Studies classroom.
Assumption: The teacher or mentor teacher has a interactive
white board (i.e. SMART Board, Promethean, etc.), a Tablet PC (also called a
Slate or Blade), a computer presenter or computer with internet access attached
to an LCD projector in the classroom. It would be ideal if students or mentees
had access to their own laptop computers or Ipads. Given parental and
school approval, and the development of specific guidelines, smartphones can be
used to enhance instruction as well.
Note: Although the Think-Trix cognitive construct can be
applied in the Judaic Studies blended learning classroom, it can be also be
used for training pre-service and in-service Jewish educators for professional
or staff development. It is our hope that Jewish educators around the globe
will form an online community of practice, a CoP, a group of people who share an interest, a craft,
and/or a profession, to enhance the delivery of instruction and training of
Jewish educators. For example, here is
a CoP you might want to join.
Note: The Think-Trix cognitive construct can be used
in a face to face and virtual classroom.
In previous blog posts we have defined thinking skills and processes, creative thinking, critical thinking and Benjamin Blooms taxonomy of educational objectives. We have also shared creative and critical thinking tools developed by Dr. Donald J. Treffinger.
What is the Think-Trix
cognitive construct?
Dr. Frank Lyman
(1987)[1] created
the Think-Trix cognitive construct as a visual cuing prompt to empower students to create their own
questions for classroom discussion and inquiry. Each visual cue is designed to enable
students to ask different types of questions (i.e. recall, similarity,
difference, cause and effect, from idea to example, from example to idea and
evaluation).
See Dr. Lyman's
Think-Trix cognitive construct image below.
How does Dr. Frank Lyman’s Think-Trix Empower Students
to Generate Their Own Questions?
After explaining, and
demonstrating how each visual cue refers to a particular type of thinking, the
teacher invites students to create their own questions related to a topic they
are studying on the form that you see below.
For
additional resources on Dr. Lyman’s Think-Trix refer to the sources listed
below:
- http://ascd.com/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_198804_mctighe.pdf
- http://www.schuylkillvalley.org/1852201120163236170/lib/1852201120163236170/_files/Think-Trix_pamphlet.pdf
- http://www.kaganonline.com/catalog/product_reviews/TTT_rationale.php
- http://toddmarrone.com/2010/08/14/think-trix-flashcards/
Below you will find an
example of student generated questions related to the topic of the internet and
web tools:
For more information on how to use Dr. Frank Lyman's Think-Trix for Judaic instruction, see these two sources:
- http://www.omnilit.com/product-toolboxforteachersandmentorslessonplansforpreserviceandinservicejudaiceducators-472245-278.html
- http://www.wheatmarkbooks.com/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=BS&Product_Code=9781604942682
On the next
post we will share an example of how Dr. Lyman’s Think-Trix construct can be used
to promote Judaic instruction and teacher training.
[1] Lyman, F. (1987) The Think Trix: A Classroom Tool for
Thinking in Response to Reading.
In Issues and Practices. A Yearbook of the State of Maryland
International Reading Association Council. 4, 15-18.
No comments:
Post a Comment